Articles Posted in Premises Liability

24-year-old Mario Rosa was shot to death in his apartment building’s vestibule in Revere, Massachusetts on Saturday. Police found him with multiple gunshot wounds and he was pronounced dead at the scene.

According to The Boston Globe, one of the neighbors in the area says that the building where Rosa was shot has a huge turnover rate and police have been to the property on a number of occasions. The Suffolk County State Police Detective Unit is investigating Rosa’s death.

Massachusetts Premises Liability

Investigators are trying to determine whether the height of the treetops close to the Orange Municipal Airport played a factor in the Massachusetts plane crash that claimed the life of one woman on New Year’s Day. The victim, Jessica L. Fay, was the daughter of Steven T. Fay, who was piloting the twin engine Cessna 310. Steven survived the crash with injuries.

The private plane crashed into a swamp as it approached the airport. The Federal Aviation Authority, which is investigation the Massachusetts aviation accident, says that the plane’s wings had separated from the fuselage right before impact. Investigators are looking into whether the landing gear hitting the trees may have caused Fay to lose control of the aircraft.

Witnesses found Jessica unconscious in the swamp. CPR was performed to try and revive her. Unfortunately, she died at the Orange, Massachusetts plane accident site.

With weather conditions sure to deposit more snow in the region, property owners will have to work extra hard to make sure that Massachusetts slip and fall accidents do not happen on their premises. While preventing this type of premises liability accident is a challenge every winter, the Supreme Judicial Court recent ruling that overturned Massachusetts’ legal standard for snow and ice cleanup on private property may make it easier for an injured party to hold a negligent owner liable.

Under the previous standard, a Massachusetts slip and fall accident victim claiming injury had to prove that the landowner was negligent and that man-made or “unnatural” causes caused the snow hazard. Now, the injured person only must prove that the landowner was negligent or neglected to use reasonable care to remove the hazardous snow or ice conditions. It doesn’t matter whether nature or a human caused the slip hazard. Public sidewalks and streets, however, are exempt from the ruling.

The SJC ruling involves a Danvers, Massachusetts slip and fall accident. In 2002, plaintiff Emanuel Papadopoulos fell and fractured his pelvis at the Liberty Tree Mall parking lot in front of a Target Corp. store. In addition to revising the “reasonable care” standard, the SJC overturned earlier rulings that favored Target and the snow removal company and returned the case to a lower court for consideration under the now new standard. The Danvers premises liability lawsuit has yet to be resolved.

As our Boston personal injury law firm has said in the past, slip and fall accidents can result in extremely painful injuries. Broken bones, hip injuries, shoulder injuries, back pain, neck injuries, traumatic brain injuries, and death can be among the more serious outcomes.

Storm’s aftermath tests court ruling, Cape Cod Times, December 22, 2010
SJC upends 100 years of slip-and-slide law, Boston Business Journal, July 26, 2010

Related Web Resources:
Slip and Fall Accidents, Boston Injury Lawyer Blog
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Slip and Fall, Nolo Continue reading

Tom Gatzunis, the commissioner of the Department of Public Safety in Massachusetts wants to ban water ball amusement rides. While a water ball ban would be outside this reach of his authority, he is asking the state Legislature and Governor Patrick to extend the scope of his power. Gatzunis issued a “stern warning” against the rides Tuesday, stating that they are inherently unsafe, especially for children.

Since they were introduced in the United States last summer, water balls have become popular in malls and at carnivals. Children climb inside of the inflatable, sealed balls, allowing them to walk, jump, roll or crawl on top of water. Gatzuni warned that there is no way to monitor the amount of oxygen inside. Certain producers of the toys say that there is enough oxygen for an average person to remain inside for 20-30 minutes.

The water balls came under scrutiny when a 5-year-old girl almost died in one at the Independence Mall in Kingston last month. The girl had stopped breathing and was taken by ambulance to Plymouth’s Jordan Hospital. According to one witness, no one knew that the girl wasn’t breathing because the flow of the water made it look like she was moving.

World Against Toys Causing Harm (WATCH), a Boston-based national child safety group, warned against a comparable toy, called the Giga Ball, last year.

Thousands of children are killed every year because of dangerous and defective toys. Water ball manufacturers, mall owners, or others might be responsible for injuries or deaths caused by the toys. If your young loved one has been hurt, call our personal injury attorneys today.

Sources:
PatriotLedger.com, Kingston mall ‘water ball’ incident sends girl to hospital

CBS Boston, State Issues ‘Stern Warning’ Against Water Balls

The Boston Globe, State official criticizes water ball attraction
Continue reading

A person was fatally injured on the southbound side of Kendall Square station in Cambridge today, an MBTA spokesperson told the Boston Globe. It happened around 11:30 a.m., and Red Line service has now resumed. It had been shut off between South Boston and Harvard Square and shuttle buses were put into service so that Transit police could investigate and responders could reach the victim.

We’ve recently seen an increasing amount of persons being injured or killed on the MBTA. Earlier this month, an 18-year-old was injured and a 21-year-old was killed on an MBTA bus. On the same day as that incident, police were called to investigate two other Red Line stabbings. At that time, riders were calling for more officers and security cameras. While the facts of this article are unclear as to the cause of the fatal injury, there is no mention of an accident, and this too may have been the result of an attack.

These kinds of criminal attacks that keep occurring on MBTA premises could give rise to negligent security personal injury or wrongful death claims. Owners or managers of premises that serve the public, like the MBTA, can be liable for injuries caused by criminal acts of third parties where the risk of the criminal attack is foreseeable. Here, given the recent rash of criminal attacks on the MBTA and particularly on the Red Line, these acts should be becoming more and more foreseeable.

At Altman & Altman, we have extensive experience handling MBTA accident and negligent security claims. In our more than 40 years of experience, we have helped victims and their families recover medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other claims related to their injury.

Sources:
The Boston Globe: Red Line service restored this afternoon: investigation into Kendall Square death continues
The Boston Globe: Man killed, 1 injured in stabbings on bus
Continue reading

The family of Vincent Cilia has settled their Boston wrongful death lawsuit against the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority and a number of contractors for $9 million. Cilia, a Massachusetts state trooper, suffered fatal injuries July 2005 when he was thrown off his motorcycle and struck the handrails in a Big Dig tunnel.

In their Suffolk County wrongful death complaint, Cilia’s family alleged that the handrails on the walkways in the tunnels are poorly designed. They compared the rails to the blades from a shredder in terms of the danger they can pose to motorists. Six other deaths have been linked to the rails. Most of the victims were dismembered after striking the them. One person survived but lost an arm.

The handrails are a little over 3 feet off the ground and approximately the height of a car window or motorcycle seat. The railings are supposed to support workers on walkways so that they don’t fall into traffic. While state officials have insisted that the handrails’ design is safe and complies with safety standards, The Boston Globe is reporting that newly obtained documents show that in 1992, the US Department of Transportation warned the Big Dig project director that there rails might pose a hazard. The director, however, replied that the rails were safe.

Yesterday evening, a man was hit by an MBTA commuter rail train in Lynn, the Boston Globe reported. It is alleged that the man was on the tracks when the Newburyport/Rockport line train hit him. He was taken to Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center by Medflight, and his condition is not known.

Owners and managers of places (in this case, for example, the MBTA) can owe legal duties to prevent harms to persons who are on the premises. This is an area of personal injury (tort law) that is called premises liability.

Premises liability law and tort law in general differ from state to state. In some states, the nature and scope of the duty owed to the entrant is focused on the status or classification of the entrant, but in other states there is a more general duty. An “invitee” is any person (1) who is on the premises at least partly for the pecuniary benefit of the owner; or (2) who is on property that is open to the public. A “licensee” is any person who has permission to be on the premises but with limited license. A “trespasser” is a person who does not have a right to be on the premises and enters without express or implied consent from the owner. Social guests are traditionally licensees because they aren’t on the property for the financial benefit of the owner. In the example above, the injured person is an “invitee” because he was at the train station at least partly for the pecuniary benefit of the MBTA and because the train station is a public place. Therefore, in any state, this man would be owed a duty of reasonable care.

One tort law concept raised by this story is contributory negligence. At the common law, if a person was injured partly because of his or her own negligence, then they could not collect any money from the other party. Many consider this to be a very bad rule, and the following example might be illustrative of why that is: If Person A was driving drunk and over the speed limit and injured Person B who was driving carefully and within the speed limit but was 6 inches over the center line in a car crash, most likely Person B could not get any compensation for her injuries because her negligence “contributed” to the crash. Because of these often unfair results, less strict “comparative fault” rules were adopted. Under comparative negligence rules, a person can still recover even if he or she contributed to the accident, but their damages will just be reduced by the amount of their own negligence. Massachusetts is a modified comparative negligence state, meaning that a claimant will only be precluded from recovery if his negligence was greater than that of all of the defendants. In the example above, the man probably had some degree of negligence since he was standing in the tracks, but there are a variety of things that we don’t know from this story. We don’t know how he ended up in the tracks, and that is very important. For example, if he slipped and fell because of the carelessness of another person or if he was pushed into the tracks by a person who should have been stopped by MBTA security, the MBTA could be completely at fault.
Continue reading

A young girl stopped breathing while inside a water toy attraction at the Pump ‘n’ Jump store at Independence Mall in Kingston. The store allowed children to climb into and walk or float in an inflatable 6-foot ball. It is a popular toy, and the Cape Cod Mall in Hyannis has a similar ride.
The girl’s condition is unknown, but she was taken to a hospital. The ride has been suspended, and the safety of the water walking balls in under investigation.

Source: The Boston Globe, Girl in Mass. Stops breathing inside water ball

Property owners or managers can be liable for unsafe conditions on their premises that injure customers. Manufacturers, retailers and others can be liable for injuries caused by their defective and dangerous products.
Continue reading

Early Sunday morning, the second armed robbery in three days near Harvard campus occurred. Kai Robert Kruger, a 21-year-old Cambridge man, shot at a police officer after robbing three Harvard freshmen.

Before the police arrived, Kruger stole the students’ credit cards, wallets and cell phones. Police spotted a man acting suspiciously, and when they stopped to investigate, he fled and fired shots. The man, later determined to be Kruger, missed and fell down a flight of stairs. He was then disarmed and taken into custody.

Early Thursday morning, a man unaffiliated with Harvard was the victim of an armed robbery in Harvard Yard. It is unclear whether the two incidents were connected.

Harvard Police told the Boston Globe that they have added patrolling officers to increase their visibility on campus.

Source: The Boston Globe, Second armed robbery in three days near Harvard campus

Negligent security on college campuses is a very common problem. If you have been injured as a result of negligent college campus security, you might be entitled to compensation.
Continue reading

There was a fire in the Downtown Crossing MBTA station Saturday night that caused evacuations. It started around the wheel and firefighters extinguished it and cleared the scene. There are no reported injuries as of yet.

Many times when there are fires, injuries can be less apparent. For example, smoke inhalation can make people sick, but the effects might not be seen immediately. Other injuries like burns tend to be more obvious.

The risk of injury on the MBTA is always at hand, whether you use it daily or only once in a while. MBTA injuries can occur for a variety of reasons, including unsafe conditions on the premises. Such injuries can be serious, and they can also create financial burdens on you and your family. Depending on the circumstances, those injured might be entitled to compensation for medical bills, lost wages, damage to property, pain and suffering, and more.
Continue reading

Contact Information