Articles Posted in Medical Malpractice

Another chapter in the tragic death of 4-year-old Rebecca Riley has reached an end. Last night, the Massachusetts wrongful death lawyers for her estate announced that a $2.5 million Boston medical malpractice settlement was reached with her psychiatrist, Dr. Kayoko Kifuji of Tufts Medical Center.

If you’ll recall, Kifuji was the one who prescribed the psychiatric drugs that Rebecca overdosed on after her parents gave her too much of the medications. Michael and Carolyn Riley were convicted of Rebecca’s murder in separate criminal trials last year.

The $2.5 million Boston psychiatric malpractice settlement is the maximum allowed under Kifuji’s insurance policy. The child psychiatrist, who continues to work at Tufts Medical Center, has not admitted any wrongdoing.

Health officials say that during three unrelated spinal surgeries, surgeons at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center operated on the wrong vertebrae of each patient. According to the hospital’s health care quality senior vice president Dr. Kenneth Sands, each Boston wrong-site surgery (the first one occurred last September) involved surgeons who miscounted the vertebrae and instead operated on the one above or below the segment that was diseased. Two of the botched spinal operations were conducted by the same doctor.

Sands says that although human mistakes caused the Boston surgical errors, the surgeons involved did follow standard procedures, including taking a “time out” to confirm what type of surgery was to be performed and on what body part. The medical mistakes occurred even though the teaching hospital had taken preventive steps.

The medical errors were detected in post surgical X-rays. While one person’s back pain got better despite the wrong-site surgery, two patients had to undergo second surgeries. The Boston medical malpractice attorney for one of the patients says that his client, a 37-year-old female, now suffers from limited mobility and continues to experience pain.

Massachusetts and federal health inspectors have since cited Beth Israel Deaconess for problems with its surgical service. The hospital says that since these three Boston wrong-site spinal surgeries, it has already made improvements, such as adopting a checklist to help surgeons mark the right vertebrae and hiring an outside expert to assess the hospital’s spinal surgery procedures.

Spinal surgeries can lead to serious injuries and complications, including disability, chronic back pain, nerve damage, dural tear, infection, bleeding, incontinence, and permanent disability. Patients that have sustained injuries because a surgeon or another medical professional was negligent may have grounds for a Boston medical malpractice lawsuit.

Beth Israel erred in 3 spinal operations, Boston.com, December 24, 2010
One Hospital: Three Wrong-Site Surgeries in Four Months, JDSupra

Related Web Resources:
Wrong-Site and Wrong-Patient Procedures in the Universal Protocol Era, Archives of Surgery
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Medical Malpractice, Nolo Continue reading

A Worcester jury has awarded Laura M. Ginisi and Joseph A. Ginisi nearly $2 million for Massachusetts medical practice in their case against St. Vincent Hospital. Joseph, 63, is now legally blind and cannot walk without assistance.

In their Worcester, Massachusetts medical malpractice complaint, the couple claims that the hospital misdiagnosed several of Joseph’s strokes and delayed the treatment he required for cancer. They claim that he sustained physical and mental injuries after going to the hospital for medical care in January 2004. Since that year, Joseph, an ex-trucker, has lived at the Millbury Health Care Center.

Joseph told his wife that he was feeling unwell on January 23, 2004. He went to St. Vincent where he underwent a CT scan. Doctors thought that the scan showed old lesions. They diagnosed him with vertigo, told him to take medication and follow up with a doctor, and discharged him. However, results from an MRI that he later took showed that he recently suffered strokes.

About 40,000 to 80,000 hospitalized patients are killed each year because of diagnostics mistakes (such as delayed diagnosis, wrong diagnosis, and misdiagnosis)-considered the number one cause of medical malpractice lawsuits. The Wall Street Journal recently reported on this issue, as well as the fact that doctors and other medical professionals are examining past medical malpractice cases to develop programs geared toward preventing similar medical errors from happening in the future. Our Boston medical malpractice law firm hopes that such analysis will indeed decrease the number of illnesses, injuries, and deaths caused by medical malpractice.

According to a study of malpractice claims, there is no one reason that diagnostic mistakes happen. Diagnostic mistakes occur most often with cancer cases. In the WSJ, breast cancer surgeon Susan Kutner reports that of the 320,000 abnormal mammograms and 420,000 abnormal biopsies identified by Kaiser Permanente in the last 15 years, 450 of the patients involved developing recurring or new cancer or abnormal biopsies. Kutner says these patients might not have been diagnosed if they hadn’t been brought in “proactively.”

In addition to medical mistakes made by the health providers resulting in diagnostic mistakes, patients can play a role in causing wrong diagnosis or misdiagnosis to happen. For example, a patient may wait too long before going to see a doctor, fail to follow medical directions, or decide not to show up to take a physician-ordered test.

According to Crico/RFM, 26% of the 1,137 medical malpractice cases between 2005 and 2009 involved diagnostic mistakes. 456 were “high severity” cases that caused patients serious injury, illness, or death. Almost half of these cases involved diagnosis mistakes.

Diagnostic Errors
Failing to diagnose or offering a wrong or delayed medical diagnosis to a patient in a timely manner can negatively affect his/her prognosis and course of treatment. It may even result in death. Wrong diagnosis, misdiagnosis, delayed diagnosis, and other diagnostic-related errors can be grounds for a Massachusetts medical malpractice case.

According to a 2007 article on CNN, the most commonly misdiagnosed illnesses include:

• Aortic dissection • Cancer • Heart attack • Clogged Arteries • Infection
What the Doctor Missed, The Wall Street Journal, September 27 2010
Five commonly misdiagnosed diseases, CNN, September 26, 2007

Related Web Resources:
Wrong Diagnosis

Medical Malpractice, Nolo Continue reading

Mike Findley and his wife Mary have agreed to settle their Boston medical malpractice lawsuit over an unsuccessful kidney transplant that he received at Tufts Medical Center for $1.25 million. The agreement was reached with the hospital, which was called New England Medical Center at the time, Drs. Krista Johansen, Erick Schadde, and Lauren Cornella and Nurse Janet A. Turgeon right before their Massachusetts personal injury trial was set to begin in Suffolk Superior Court.

The couple had accused doctors of botching what should have been the perfect kidney match in 2003. The donor kidney, which had comes from Mike’s brother Jeff, was the perfect match, but the Findleys contend that inexperienced physicians, administrative breakdowns at the teaching hospital, and understaffing allegedly contributed to its death just one week after the transplant, which took place on June 25, 2003.

According to Mike’s Boston medical malpractice attorney, following the transplant procedure, doctors and nurses failed to respond properly even though they knew that the patient’s urine output was dramatically reduced-a sign that the new kidney was failing. No attending physician was called and a renal ultrasound wasn’t ordered until the next day. Also, three of the doctors involved were in training and two were interns that had been working there for less than a month.

According to the New York Times, more radiation overdoses have occurred from CT brain perfusion scans than what was originally thought. More than 400 patients in the US have reportedly experienced higher radiation doses from the scans-although the FDA says that this number may be lower than the actual number of overdose cases. Last year, the Food and Drug Administration began an inquiry into why some patients that underwent the scan, which tests for stroke, experienced radiation overdose. GE Healthcare is the company that supplies the scanners.

CT brain perfusion scans are designed to deliver radiation doses equal to about 200 skull X-rays. Yet some patients reportedly received up to 13 times that radiation amount.

While the FDA has yet to release any official findings, the New York Times says that not only are the overdoses larger than what was originally determined, but some patients are experiencing much more serious side effects than hair loss, including confusion, headaches, memory loss, and a possibly higher risk of developing cancer or brain damage.

Despite these symptoms, some hospitals and doctors reportedly failed to detect that patients had experienced radiation overdose. Even after the FDA put out a national alert asking that hospitals check the tests’ radiation output, some hospitals kept overdosing patients for weeks or months.

Causes of the radiation overdoses have included improper test administration by physicians, which can be grounds for a medical malpractice case, and possible product defect issues, such as design deficiencies and failure to provide the proper training for how to use the medical devices.

After Stroke Scans, Patients Face Serious Health Risks, The New York Times, July 31, 2010
FDA Investigates Radiation Overdose At Hospitals, NPR, December 15, 2009

Related Web Resources:
FDA

Medical Malpractice, Nolo Continue reading

According to the Boston Globe, a federal immigration agency report examining the death of immigrant detainee Pedro Tavarez accuses Suffolk County Jail medical staff of waiting too long to get the 49-year-old man the proper medical help. Tavarez, who was suffering from diabetes and hypertension, was being held at the jail so he could be deported back to the Dominican Republic. He died of heart failure on October 19.
after a deadly bacterial infection ravaged his body.

The 98-page report by the ICE’s Office of Professional Responsibility claims that Tavarez did not receive the proper medical care while at the jail. Prison Health Services Inc. runs the jail infirmary.

Tavarez’s medical condition grew worse and although Boston Medical Center is closer to the jail, he was taken to Shattuck Hospital where he suffered a heart attack. Unfortunately, the Jamaica Plain hospital lacks medical emergency services, so he was transported to Faulkner Hospital. Due to the unavailability of an intensive-care bed, he was sent to Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

The report says language barriers, incomplete medical records, and staff that failed to check his vitals and get him to the right hospital immediately contributed to Tavarez not getting the proper medical care that he needed. He was initially treated for a cold but after his condition deteriorated he was admitted to an infirmary where staff was supposed to check his vitals every four hours. The report says that this did not always happen. Also, the Bureau of Prisons doctor has said that Tavarez should have been transported to a hospital sooner. Instead, he stayed at the jail infirmary for another day.

Prisons and jails owe prisoners, detainees, and suspects a duty of care to protect them from Boston police brutality and crimes committed by other inmates. The law enforcement officers must also must provide them with the proper emergency and medical care when warranted and make sure that they are fed and given enough to drink. Unfortunately, there are people who end up hurt or dead while in police custody because other parties were negligent or reckless. Injured suspects and prisoners have been known to file Boston injury lawsuits seeking compensation for the harm that they suffered.

Suffolk jail is faulted in death of detainee, Boston, July 30, 2010
Report faults care in death of Boston detainee, Boston Herald, July 30, 2010
Read the Government’s Federal Report (PDF)

Related Web Resources:
ICE’s Office of Professional Responsibility

Suffolk County Jail
Continue reading

A study of 323 Boston dementia patients from 22 assisted living facilities is calling into question whether treating residents advanced stage dementia patients who are suffering from pneumonia with antibiotics is the proper course of action. According to the study’s findings, which was published last week in the Archives of Internal Medicine, antibiotics may prolong a dementia patient’s life for about nine months. However, in the meantime, the resident may be experiencing greater pain, anxiety, and depression. Patients who were not treated with antibiotics appeared to experience greater levels of comfort than residents who were given the medication.

Pneumonia is a common illness for patients with advanced dementia because they have swallowing problems, making it easy for food to get caught in their lungs, and their immune system is likely impaired. The researchers are saying that it is important that caregivers discuss medical options with a patient’s family first rather than automatically treating his/her pneumonia with antibiotics..

Unfortunately, many nursing homes don’t consult with a patient’s family members first because they are worried they might get sued for Boston nursing home negligence. To cover their bases, they provide aggressive medical care-an option that might not be the best course of action for every resident.

Boston Nursing Home Negligence
It isn’t enough for a Massachusetts assisted living facility to provide a patient with medical and nursing care. The type of treatment provided must be the the one that’s best one for the patient’s specific needs. It is important that the resident or family members are consulted about medical decisions and informed consent is obtained.

Study questions dementia care, Boston.com, July 13, 2010
When Pneumonia Follows Severe Dementia, New York TImes, July 23, 2010

Related Web Resources:
Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Forms of Dementia, WebMD
Archives of Internal Medicine
Continue reading

The parents of 7-month-old Kaylee Marie Drolet are suing Baystate Medical Center in Springfield and four doctors for Massachusetts medical malpractice. Matthew Drolet and Samantha Martino claim the defendants conducted an autopsy on Kaylee and took out her organs without their consent. The hospital disagrees, claiming that Martino gave her verbal consent that her baby’s organs could be removed.

Kaylee passed away on March 31, 2007. The infant had suffered from a very rare genetic disease called Charged syndrome.

Martino, 26, says that minutes after Kaylee was pronounced dead, a hospital doctor asked her to complete paperwork for an autopsy. She claims that she asked him to come back later but that he never did.

According to emergency room doctors, the fear of ER medical malpractice is what prompts some of them to overtest and overtreat patients. As a result, CT scans, blood tests, and prescription drugs may be ordered even though a patient actually doesn’t need them. Unfortunately, health complications can arise as a result of medical overtreatment.

Because of the fast-paced nature of Massachusetts emergency rooms, doctors don’t have the luxury of sitting down and extensively interviewing each patient. By ordering additional tests or providing more care than what a patient’s initial symptoms may indicate, many ER physicians are covering their bases. They also may feel pressure from patients who come into the ER demanding that they get an X-ray or a CT scan with results that can actually be verified instead of just a visual exam by a doctor.

However, what many patients don’t realize is that overtesting and overtreatment not only results in more expensive medical bills, but they also can increase health risks. For example, taking unnecessary prescription drugs can up the chances of complications. A CT scan not only only stresses out the body, but it also can infuse it with three years worth of radiation. The ER physician that ordered the unnecessary test or provided excessive medical care may later end up the defendant of a Boston medical malpractice lawsuit.

Emergency Room Facts (from AP):
• More than 116 million ER visits take place in the US every year.
• Chest pain and abdominal pain are two of the most common reasons why adults go to ERs.
• In nearly 50% of ER visits in 2006, ER doctors ordered CT scans, X-rays, and other imaging tests.
• 75% of ER patients were given medication, including antibiotics.
• 1/3rd of ER patients were given blood tests.
• From 2006 – 2008 more than 600 medical malpractice lawsuits were filed against ER doctors-that’s approximately 3% of their patients.

The Associated Press, which recently conducted an extensive review of medical overtreatment, reports that excessive medical care is an issue of concern not just in the ER arena, but also in other medical fields. Back pain, which is considered the leading overtreated condition, often results in repeated MRI scans and unnecessary spinal surgeries. Tens of millions of antibiotics are prescribed for colds and other viruses that medication can’t cure. Thousands of patients that have had stents inserted in them for blocked heart arteries could have been treated with medication instead.
ER doctors: Lawsuit fears lead to overtesting, AP/Google, June 21, 2010

Medical Overtreatment May Be Making Us Sicker, CBS News, June 7, 2010
Related Web Resources:
Malpractice and the emergency room, Wrong Diagnosis
Hospitals and Medical Centers, Search Boston Continue reading

Contact Information